PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Clinical Trials and Future Outlooks of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab: A Narrative Review

Ophthalmology and Therapy, ISSN: 2193-6528, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 51-69
2024
  • 4
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 12
    Captures
  • 4
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    4
    • Citation Indexes
      3
    • Clinical Citations
      1
      • PubMed Guidelines
        1
  • Captures
    12
  • Mentions
    4
    • News Mentions
      4
      • News
        4

Most Recent News

Bringing It All Back Home: Reshaping Ophthalmology's Clinic with Home OCT; The FDA-approved Scanly, a home-based OCT device, revolutionizes nAMD care by empowering patients with self-monitoring and enhancing personalized treatment.

When a breakthrough therapy receives US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, it represents years of research, clinical trials, and collaboration to bring an additional

Review Description

The port delivery system (PDS) of anti-VEGF therapy provides continuous delivery of ranibizumab (RBZ). In October of 2021, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the PDS with RBZ as a treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As the field of PDS with RBZ is progressing rapidly, this narrative review provides a much-needed overview of existing clinical trials as well as ongoing and upcoming trials investigating PDS with RBZ. The phase 2 LADDER trial reported that the mean time to first refill with RBZ PDS 100 mg/ml was 15.8 months (80% CI 12.1–20.6), and pharmacokinetic profiling revealed a sustained concentration of RBZ in serum and aqueous humor. Later, the phase 3 ARCHWAY trial reported that PDS with RBZ (100 mg/ml) refilled every 24 weeks was non-inferior to monthly intravitreal injection (IVI) with RBZ (0.5 mg) in patients with nAMD over 9 months and 2 years. However, patients with PDS had a higher rate of adverse events including vitreous hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Patients indicate high treatment satisfaction with both PDS and IVI, but the lower number of treatments with PDS was reported as a preferred choice. Several ongoing and future clinical trials, of which details are discussed in this paper, are further exploring the potentials of PDS with RBZ. We conclude that the PDS provides continuous deliverance of RBZ and that clinical efficacy levels are non-inferior to IVI therapy for nAMD. Yet, a higher rate of adverse events remains a concerning detail for widespread implementation. Future studies are warranted to better understand which patients may benefit best from this treatment approach, if long-term efficacy can be sustained, and if safety of PDS can be further improved.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know