High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry: Recent Developments and Future Directions
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, ISSN: 2167-583X, Vol: 11, Issue: 3, Page: 374-380
2023
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Purpose of Review: This review article will discuss recent developments in high-resolution pharyngeal manometry, including diagnostic applications, and proposed standard metrics and protocol, as well as its use as a therapeutic biofeedback tool. Recent Findings: An International High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM) Working Group has proposed use of three classes of HRPM metric standardization of HRPM data collection: pharyngeal lumen occlusive pressures (including pressures at the velopharynx, mesopharynx, and hypopharynx), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function parameters (UES relaxation time and integrated relaxation pressure), and hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure. The pharyngeal contractile integral (PhCI), in particular, has been shown to have promise as an indicator of the presence of swallowing impairment. Complex biomechanical relationships between pharyngeal drive and UES contractility have been identified, necessitating that clinicians take the entire system into account when assessing pharyngeal swallowing deficits. HRPM biofeedback therapy is an emerging form of dysphagia therapy which provides visual feedback of swallowing performance to patients in real time. Summary: HRPM is a non-radiologic clinical tool that provides objective measures of pharyngeal swallowing pressures and timing. Development of normative values remains an ongoing effort, with only a few studies available that provide normal values for the standard metrics recently proposed by the HRPM International Working Group. HRPM biofeedback dysphagia therapy is safe and well-tolerated, and has anecdotal evidence supporting its use.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know