Robotic single-site surgery: A summary of the current clinical experience
Current Surgery Reports, ISSN: 2167-4817, Vol: 4, Issue: 6
2016
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The robotic single-site platform was released in late 2011 and since then it has been applied in the fields of gynecologic surgery and general surgery. In this review, we include the reported robotic experience in the above-described fields using this platform to perform surgery as well as its advantages and limitations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053493956&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40137-016-0142-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know