Preoperative Diet Therapy: The Right Choice of Components and Supplements Can Beneficially Impact Clinical Outcomes
Current Surgery Reports, ISSN: 2167-4817, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: 225-233
2023
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Review Description
Purpose of Review: It is well established that malnutrition leads to worse outcomes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. To help prevent this, a litany of tools and scoring systems have been identified to identify both individuals and groups of patients who are at risk for malnutrition. The purpose of this review is to highlight the groups who are at the highest risk of malnutrition and to review the adjuncts to nutritional support in an effort to optimize post-operative outcomes. Recent Findings: This review highlights the need to nutritionally optimize certain patient populations, including patients presenting with starvation-related malnutrition, geriatric patients, patients undergoing major surgery, and patients with sarcopenic obesity. In addition, we review the adjuncts to nutritional support, including preoperative carbohydrate loading, immune and metabolic modulation using arginine, fish oils, and RNA supplementation, and the use of pre and probiotics. Summary: Patient nutrition remains a key preoperative intervenable area for quality improvement as a means to improve patient outcomes post-procedure. Not only have specific scoring systems been devised to quantify risk of complications in individuals, certain groups remain at high risk of malnutrition. Recognizing these groups preoperatively and providing nutritional adjuncts to improve patients’ nutritional status may help lead to improved patient outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know