Interpretable Machine Learning for Texture-Dependent Constitutive Models with Automatic Code Generation for Topological Optimization
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, ISSN: 2193-9772, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 373-392
2021
- 9Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Genetic programming-based symbolic regression (GPSR) is a machine learning method which produces symbolic models that can be readily interpreted. This study utilized GPSR to derive uniaxial texture-based constitutive models for an additively manufactured alloy which were evaluated in post hoc analyses. Training data consisted of microscopy and mechanical testing data provided by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) which was supplemented using a viscoplastic model calibrated to the observed data. The validity of the calibrated crystal plasticity viscoplastic model is demonstrated as part of the 2019 AFRL Additive Manufacturing Modeling Challenge Series. Additionally, an expression evaluator was developed to integrate the constitutive models into the topology optimization software package Plato. A significant aspect of this paper is the presentation of these topics as components within a highly automated framework that allows efficient incorporation of microstructural characteristics into design activities. A topology optimization example was conducted using the GPSR results that constitutes application of the automated framework and post hoc analyses of the GPSR models demonstrate interpretability, suitability, and a probabilistic method to quantify domain bounds.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114373842&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40192-021-00231-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know