Role of Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Self-Paced Exercise: What are We Actually Measuring?
Sports Medicine, ISSN: 1179-2035, Vol: 45, Issue: 9, Page: 1235-1243
2015
- 147Citations
- 19Usage
- 338Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations147
- Citation Indexes147
- 147
- CrossRef141
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
- Captures338
- Readers338
- 338
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Passion and Pacing in Endurance Performance
Introduction Pushing themselves to continuously sustain maximal effort over a long period of time might nevertheless entail several risks for passionate athletes, such as overtraining and injuries (Curran et al., 2015; Schwellnus et al., 2016; Soligard et al., 2016). In cyclic middle and long-distance exercise, athletes need to adequately estimate their physiological capacity and regulate exercise
Review Description
Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and effort are considered extremely important in the regulation of intensity during self-paced physical activity. While effort and exertion are slightly different constructs, these terms are often used interchangeably within the literature. The development of perceptions of both effort and exertion is a complicated process involving numerous neural processes occurring in various regions within the brain. It is widely accepted that perceptions of effort are highly dependent on efferent copies of central drive which are sent from motor to sensory regions of the brain. Additionally, it has been suggested that perceptions of effort and exertion are integrated based on the balance between corollary discharge and actual afferent feedback; however, the involvement of peripheral afferent sensory feedback in the development of such perceptions has been debated. As such, this review examines the possible difference between effort and exertion, and the implications of such differences in understanding the role of such perceptions in the regulation of pace during exercise.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939268442&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26054383; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1085; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2086&context=ecuworkspost2013; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40279-015-0344-5; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40279-015-0344-5.pdf; http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1085
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know