Establishing Patient Registries for Rare Diseases: Rationale and Challenges
Pharmaceutical Medicine, ISSN: 1179-1993, Vol: 34, Issue: 3, Page: 185-190
2020
- 77Citations
- 107Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations77
- Citation Indexes75
- 75
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures107
- Readers107
- 107
Article Description
Globally, an estimated 350 million people are affected by a rare disease diagnosis. Knowledge limitations persist for the majority of rare conditions due to systemic and structural challenges in healthcare and research. Disease-specific patient populations are often small and geographically dispersed; funding support for research is restricted; and diagnostic delays are common due to disease complexities, limited medical training for practitioners, and evolving foundational knowledge related to disease characterization. Patient registries can be effective, convenient, and cost-efficient tools to support documentation of the natural history of a disease, centering patients as research partners in the process while uniting rare communities around a common initiative. Current global trends towards innovative and patient-centered healthcare are enabling patient registries to increasingly emerge as valuable tools for use within rare disease research and drug development. This article describes the value of and rationale for establishing rare disease patient registries and the considerations and challenges that stakeholders, such as researchers, industry, health care providers, and patient community organizations, may encounter.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082928230&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-020-00332-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215853; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40290-020-00332-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-020-00332-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40290-020-00332-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know