“Regulatory Sandboxes” Could Solve the Regulatory Problems Encountered in Europe and Arising from Innovation in Biological Medicinal Products
Pharmaceutical Medicine, ISSN: 1179-1993, Vol: 38, Issue: 1, Page: 19-23
2024
- 1Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Pharmaceutical innovation can sometimes clash with existing regulations, creating challenges for pioneering medicinal products, especially biologics, as they transition from the research phase to product development and post-approval categorisation. For instance, vaccines and advanced therapy medicinal products must fall under the category of biological medicinal products. However, the ability to chemically synthesise both proteins or mRNA can rule out classifying them as vaccines or advanced therapy medicinal products. Consequently, many organic products face regulatory obstacles when attempting to reach the market owing to their inherent natures or involved technologies. The European Commission’s proposal for a directive to overhaul the European Union pharmaceutical legislation brings in a new tool: the regulatory sandboxes. They could be a suitable solution to manufacture pioneering medicinal products. Regulatory sandboxes are a form of legal experimentation helping with the marketing of a medicinal product based on groundbreaking technology as they sidestep current regulations. In essence, a regulatory sandbox is a tailor-made, inherently flexible, and time-limited regulatory framework facilitating the development of a drug outside the standard regulatory framework.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179351833&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-023-00507-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38070124; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40290-023-00507-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-023-00507-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40290-023-00507-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know