Murine Double-Minute 2 Homolog Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms 285 and 309 in Cervical Carcinogenesis
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, ISSN: 1179-2000, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: 235-244
2015
- 12Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef5
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Background and Objective: In Caucasians, the MDM2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 285 G>C (rs117039649) neutralizes the effect of 309 T>G (rs2279744), which increases MDM2 expression and impairs the p53 pathway. In this study, we examined the distribution of these two SNPs in Polish women with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n = 379), adenocarcinoma (n = 59) and other cervical tumor types (n = 18). Methods: The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique and DNA sequencing were employed in our study. Results: The P trend value calculated for the MDM2 285 G>C polymorphism was statistically significant (P = 0.016) for SCC. Using logistical regression analysis adjusted for the effect of age, pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, tobacco smoking, and menopausal status, we observed that the MDM2 285 G>C SNP protected against SCC, with an adjusted odd ratio (OR) for the C carriers versus G/G genotype of 0.536 (P = 0.019). Stratified analyses of MDM2 285 G>C revealed a protective role of the C allele against SCC in women with a positive history of oral contraceptive use (age-adjusted OR 0.413, P = 0.021) and in premenopausal women (age-adjusted OR 0.362, P = 0.022). We also found that the 285GG/309GG vs 285GG/309 TT genotype increased the risk of SCC (adjusted OR 1.890, P = 0.005). However, the 285CC/309GG + 285GC/309GG versus 285GG/309GG genotype reduced the risk of SCC (adjusted OR 0.311, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the MDM2 285C gene variant and 285CC/309GG + 285GC/309GG genotypes protect against SCC, most likely by neutralizing the effect of the 309 T>G SNP. The 285GG/309GG genotype increases the risk of SCC possibly due to increased MDM2 expression.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84938998316&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0153-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224627; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40291-015-0153-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0153-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40291-015-0153-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know