The Use of New Communications Technologies to Evaluate and Intervene in Substance Use Disorders
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, ISSN: 2196-2979, Vol: 2, Issue: 1, Page: 23-29
2015
- 7Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef2
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Review Description
The widespread availability of high-speed, mobile cellular telephones and other advances in communication technology have the potential to change the way in which interventions for substance use disorders (SUD) are delivered and how progress is monitored. This article reviews recent research on the use of new technology to monitor progress and deliver interventions for SUD. Several studies of telephone-based interventions have shown positive effects, but sometimes only in certain subgroups. However, other studies have produced negative results. Studies have supported the use of interactive voice response (IVR) and personal digital assistants (PDAs) to conduct assessments, but there are few data on whether IVR- or PDA-based interventions improve outcomes. Text messaging has received comparatively little research, but appears promising as a means to conduct assessments and deliver automated interventions. Finally, smartphone technology provides the widest range of features and interventions and the greatest flexibility, but few intervention studies using smartphones have been conducted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84940644220&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0017-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527457; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40473-014-0017-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0017-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40473-014-0017-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know