The Quest for K: Bion and Contemporary Neurocognitive Models of Psychosis
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, ISSN: 2196-2979, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 41-48
2023
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Review Description
Purpose of Review: There have been increasing efforts to enhance dialog between the neuroscientific and psychotherapeutic literature. This approach can deepen and enrich our understanding of psychiatric conditions, broadening the scope of possible interventions when addressing symptomatology. It also allows for greater appreciation of the richness of a patient’s subjective experience and of the imperative need to foster a working alliance, as the success of a treatment plan can hinge on such considerations. Recent Findings: There are important and clinically relevant points of convergence that emerge when bridging extant psychoanalytic and neurobiological research. Psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion has written extensively on his work with individuals with psychotic disorders (including schizophrenia). His views on the nature of thinking as an interpersonal process underline the need to attune to patients’ internal reality and to the means of communication that are available to them. In schizophrenia, such inner experiences can be difficult for clinicians to process, manifesting as they do as delusional content, hallucinatory experiences, and speech disorganization. It is crucial in such situations to expand awareness of what the subjective reality is for patients and what they are attempting to convey by way of their symptoms. Summary: This paper will bridge concepts from Bion’s work on thinking and on schizophrenia with current neurocognitive frameworks of psychotic disorders. The relevance for the clinical encounter will also be discussed, emphasizing the need to help patients feel less alienated and disempowered as they navigate the challenges of their condition.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know