Predictors of Response to rTMS in Severe Mental Illnesses- Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, ISSN: 2196-2979, Vol: 11, Issue: 3, Page: 146-163
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Purpose of Review: Practice recommendations now include the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of various outcomes within schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, lack of data with respect to clinical, stimulation specific and neural predictors limits their translational potential in the clinics. We performed a scoping review of predictors for response to rTMS in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Recent Findings: Our review found that relatively small number of studies assess predictors or correlates of response compared to the vast pool of studies assessing the efficacy of rTMS in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Available literature suggests younger age and female gender for improvement in auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in schizophrenia; younger age for improvement in negative symptoms of schizophrenia; and younger age and less severe depression for bipolar depression have been found to be significant and well replicated predictors of rTMS response. Although some studies find various neural correlates of response to rTMS, they were not replicated. Summary: This scoping review screened 986 articles to finally conduct a detailed review of 71 articles for clinical, stimulation-specific and neural predictors of response to rTMS in various outcomes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. While younger age predicted response to rTMS treatment across various outcomes in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, additionally female gender for AVH in schizophrenia and less severe depression for bipolar depression were found to be significant predictors of rTMS response. We suggest that all clinical trials on rTMS must focus on assessing for predictors of response.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know