Predictive ability of a self-rated fall risk assessment tool in community-dwelling older women
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN: 1720-8319, Vol: 35, Issue: 6, Page: 1205-1212
2023
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Background: Falls are a substantial health problem among older adults. An accessible and reliable tool for assessing individual fall risk is needed. Aims: The predictive ability of a one-page self-rated fall risk assessment form (KaatumisSeula® [KS]) was evaluated among older women in its current form. Methods: A subsample (n = 384) of community-living older women (aged 72–84 years) participating in the Kuopio Fall Prevention Study (KFPS) completed the KS form. Participants’ falls were prospectively registered for 12 months with SMS messages. Their group status and form-based fall risk category were compared to the verified fall events during the KFPS intervention. Negative binomial regression and multinomial regression analyses were used. Physical performance measurements (single leg stance, leg extension strength and grip strength) were used as covariates. Results: During the follow-up, 43.8% of women fell at least once. Among the fallers, 76.8% had at least one self-determined injurious fall, and 26.2% had falls requiring medical attention. According to KS, 7.6% of the women had low fall risk, 75.0% moderate, 15.4% substantial, and only 2.1% high fall risk. Women in the “moderate fall risk” group had 1.47-fold (95% CI 0.74–2.91; nonsignificant), in “substantial fall risk” 4.00-fold (1.93–8.3; p < 0.001) and in “high fall risk” 3.00-fold (0.97–9.22; nonsignificant) higher risk of falls compared to the “low fall risk” group. Performance in physical tests did not account for future falls. Conclusions: The KS form proved to be a feasible tool for self-administered fall risk assessment with moderate predictive ability. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02665169, date of first registration 27/01/2016.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85158139334&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02423-w; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145268; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02665169; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40520-023-02423-w; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02423-w; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-023-02423-w
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know