Recovery 101: A Community Psychoeducation Program on Mental Health Recovery and Peer Support Services Created by an Academic Psychiatrist and Delivered by Peers
Academic Psychiatry, ISSN: 1545-7230, Vol: 46, Issue: 6, Page: 735-739
2022
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Objective: Despite the ongoing growing interest and established benefits of mental health recovery and peer support services, little is known about the effects of mental health recovery and peer support services specifically in community education programs. Seeking to further expand this scope, this article details the development, implementation, and evaluation of a recovery and peer services community psychoeducation program created by an academic psychiatrist and delivered by trained mental health peers. Methods: A community psychoeducation intervention on recovery and peer services was provided in 2 different series: 5-session and 1-session series. Participants in the intervention were recruited from 2 local nonprofit recovery-oriented organizations and a public mental health service agency. Surveys were administered before and after each presentation session and analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Quantitative survey items covering knowledge, awareness, interest, and likelihood of involvement in peer services for recovery all showed statistically significant gains from before to after the sessions. The qualitative data provided information about the participants’ interests in the program in terms of knowledge of recovery, self-improvement, advocacy, resources, support, and nonspecific positive comments. Conclusions: An essential contribution of the program was to introduce participants to recovery and peer services. It also provided them with foundational knowledge that placed participants in a position to begin to practice the concepts of recovery. According to the participants’ comments in the surveys, the program imbued a sense of hope and motivation; support and fellowship; and, importantly, role modeling and wisdom from the presenters.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130990766&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-022-01652-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622312; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40596-022-01652-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-022-01652-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40596-022-01652-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know