PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Type 2 diabetes treatment and progression of chronic kidney disease in Italian family practice

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, ISSN: 1720-8386, Vol: 42, Issue: 7, Page: 787-796
2019
  • 3
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 28
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Aims: Progressive chronic kidney disease represents a dreadful complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We tested the pattern of use and the renal effects of old glucose-lowering drugs in T2DM patients cared for by Italian general practitioners (GPs). Methods: Data of 2606 T2DM patients were extracted from the databases of GPs, who do not have access to the most recent glucose-lowering drugs in Italy. The rate of kidney function decline was calculated by CKD-EPI, based on two consecutive creatinine values. Results: Metformin was used in 55% of cases, either alone or with sulfonylureas/repaglinide, across the whole spectrum of CKD (from 66% in stage G1 to only 8% in G4). Sulfonylurea use peaked at 21–22% in stage G2–G3a, whereas repaglinide use significantly increased from 8% in G1 to 22% in G4. The median rate of CKD decline was − 1.64 mL/min/1.73 m per year; it was higher in G1 (− 3.22 per year) and progressively lower with CKD severity. 826 cases (31.7%) were classified as fast progressors (eGFR decline more negative than − 5 mL/min/1.73 m per year). The risk of fast progressing CKD was associated with increasing BMI, albuminuria, and sulfonylurea use, alone (OR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–1.85), or in association with metformin (OR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.04–1.88). No associations were demonstrated for metformin, cardiovascular and lipid lowering drug use. Conclusion: In the setting of Italian family practice, sulfonylurea use is associated with progressive CKD in patients with T2DM. Metformin, at doses progressively reduced according to CKD stages, as recommended by guidelines, is not associated with fast progression.

Bibliographic Details

G. Ermini; C. Tosetti; D. Zocchi; M. Mandreoli; M. T. Caletti; G. Marchesini; Antonio Balduzzi; Giulio Bandi; Beatrice Bassi; Paolo Borghi; Loris Brini; Antonino Cammarata; Roberto Casadio; Roberto Cau; Lucia Cecchini; Aurelio Del Vecchio; Maria Immacolata De Vicariis; Shirley Ehrlich; Giuliano Ermini; Livio Franco; Angela Inì; Vincenzo La Fratta; Marco Maccaferri; Angelo Masi; Annunzio Matrà; Piero Mazzetti Gaito; Giampiero Mazzoni; Dante Monti; Mara Mori; Massimo Oggianu; Maria Palasciano; Anna Paternicò; Fernando Perrone; Roberto Pierallini; Stefano Quadrelli; Stefano Rubini; Marcello Salera; Alberto Serio; Antonella Silletti; Elisabetta Simoncini; Luigi Simoni; Pietro Speziali; Cesare Tosetti; Pietro Velonà; Andrea Verri; Domenico Zisa; Donato Zocchi

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Medicine; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know