Towards Positivity: A Large-Scale Diachronic Sentiment Analysis of the Humanities and Social Sciences in China
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, ISSN: 2198-2600, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 569-589
2023
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With its rising number of publications and expanding international collaborations, China’s humanities and social sciences (HSS) research is displaying its potential for global prominence. Researchers have been exploring the development of China’s HSS from different perspectives. However, the examinations from the perspective of sentiment analysis are scanty. Our aim is then to examine the sentiment features in Chinese HSS academic writing, by analyzing a large-scale corpus with over 275 million characters and with a time span from 2000 to 2020. Considering that most studies only focused on abstracts, we examined both the abstracts and the full texts, as well as a direct comparison between them. We found that Chinese HSS academic writing has evolved to be more positively biased in the past two decades, showing an upward trend in the use of positive words and a slight downward trend in the use of negative words. However, the upward trend of positive words in the full texts is not that clear, resembling a fluctuating pattern. Regarding the comparison, the abstracts are more likely to use positive words while the full texts tend to use more negative words. These phenomena can be explained with the social cognitive theory, in that they may be shaped by a joint force of the nature of human beings, the nature of language, the particular socio-cultural background in China and the features of the academic genre.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know