Geo-electrical Characterisation for CO Sequestration in Porous Media
Environmental Processes, ISSN: 2198-7505, Vol: 4, Issue: 2, Page: 303-317
2017
- 8Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Developing monitoring strategies for the detection and monitoring of possible CO leakage or migration from existing and anticipated storage media are important because they can provide an early warning of unplanned CO leakage from a storage site. While previous works have concentrated on silicate and carbonate porous media, this work explores geoelectrical techniques in basalt medium in a series of well-defined laboratory experiments. These were carried out to identify the key factors which affect geoelectrical monitoring technique of CO in porous media using low cost and efficient time domain reflectometry (TDR). The system has been set up for simultaneous measurement of the bulk electrical conductivity and bulk dielectric permittivity of CO-water-porous media system in silica sand, basalt and limestone. Factors investigated include pH, pressure, temperature, salinity, salt type and the materials of the porous media. Results show that the bulk electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity decrease as water saturation decreases. Noticeably, electrical conductivity and permittivity decrease due to the changes in water saturation and the relationship remains the highest in limestone except at the start of the experiment. Also, an increase in temperature, pressure and salinity tend to increase the bulk electrical conductivity (σ) and permittivity (ε) of the CO-water-porous media system during the drainage experiment. On the other hand, pH and concentrations of different types of salt do not seem to have significant effect on the geoelectrical characteristics of the system. It was evident that Archie’s equation fit the experimental results well and the parameters obtained were in good agreement with those in the literatures. The regression shows a good reliability in the prediction of electrical properties during the monitoring process of CO sequestration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020415975&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40710-017-0222-2
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know