Predicting Survival Across Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis: The GAP-ILD Model
Rheumatology and Therapy, ISSN: 2198-6584, Vol: 7, Issue: 4, Page: 967-978
2020
- 10Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Introduction: Risk prediction is challenging in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) because of heterogeneity and patient-specific variables. Our objective was to assess whether mortality is accurately predicted in patients with IIM and AE-ILD by using the gender age physiology ILD (GAP-ILD) model, a clinical prediction model that was previously validated in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, wherein 60 consecutive patients with IIM and AE-ILD admitted between February 2011 and April 2019. The GAP-ILD was assessed retrospectively on the basis of gender, age and pulmonary function test. Results: Patients with AE-ILD (n = 60) were identified and collected, 26 deaths occurred during follow-up, and the non-survivors group presented a higher level of GAP-ILD index (P = 0.005), bacterial infection (P = 0.013), and myositis disease activity assessment (MYOACT) (P = 0.031). The subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis of overall mortality in AE-ILD revealed that bacterial infection (OR 5.275, P = 0.037) and GAP-ILD index (OR 2.292, P = 0.011) conferred significant risk of mortality. The GAP-ILD index was able to separate patients with AE-ILD into two groups with a statistically significant difference in survival rate (log rank P = 0.002). Satisfactory mortality estimation was maintained in the corresponding GAP-ILD index across the AE-ILD group. Conclusion: The GAP-ILD model preforms well in risk prediction of mortality among patients with IIM and AE-ILD. Pulmonary bacterial infection can also be taken as an initial predictor of poor prognosis in patients with IIM and AE-ILD that must be taken seriously.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111389847&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00244-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106937; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40744-020-00244-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00244-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40744-020-00244-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know