Decentralized multi-agent cooperation via adaptive partner modeling
Complex and Intelligent Systems, ISSN: 2198-6053, Vol: 10, Issue: 4, Page: 4989-5004
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Multi-agent reinforcement learning encounters a non-stationary challenge, where agents concurrently update their policies, leading to changes in the environment. Existing approaches have tackled this challenge through communication among agents to obtain their partners’ actions, but this introduces computational complexity known as partner sample complexity. An alternative approach is to develop partner models that generate samples instead of direct communication to mitigate this complexity. However, a discrepancy arises between the real policies distribution and the policy of partner models, termed as model bias, which can significantly impact performance when heavily relying on partner models. In order to achieve a trade-off between sample complexity and performance, a novel multi-agent model-based reinforcement learning algorithm called decentralized adaptive partner modeling (DAPM) is proposed, which utilizes fictitious self play (FSP) to construct partner models and update policies. Model bias is addressed by establishing an upper bound to restrict the usage of partner models. Coupled with that, an adaptive rollout approach is introduced, enabling real agents to dynamically communicate with partner models based on their quality, ensuring that agent performance can progressively improve with partner model samples. The effectiveness of DAPM is exhibited in two multi-agent tasks, showing that DAPM outperforms existing model-free algorithms in terms of partner sample complexity and training stability. Specifically, DAPM requires 28.5% fewer communications compared to the best baseline and exhibits reduced fluctuations in the learning curve, indicating superior performance.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know