Comparative study of semi-distributed and 2D-distributed hydrological models for streamflow prediction in a data scarce mountainous watershed
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, ISSN: 2363-6211, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: 2933-2949
2022
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With the climatic and irregular topography favor, streamflow simulation in the study area is often challenging because of complex hydrological process and large uncertainty. To face these challenges, semi-distributed, and 2D-distributed hydrological models, SWAT and RRI, were proposed to carry out the streamflow simulation in this study. The present work aims to compare and evaluated the hydrological behavior of the selected models for a data-scarce mountainous watershed located in Myanmar. The models’ calibration (2001–2010) and validation (2011–2015) process are done in six gauging stations along the Chindwin River of the study area. In calibration, SWAT gave satisfactory monthly performances measured with the coefficient of determination (R) ranging between 0.65 and 0.78, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) between 0.5 and 0.65, whereas RRI obtained R was 0.65–0.7, NSE between 0.54 and 0.71, respectively. The predicted flow from RRI model gives a good agreement with the observed flow, is slightly better than the SWAT model in daily simulation from the comparative analysis. The variation of dry and wet seasonal estimated streamflow of the hydrological models relative to observed flow in calibration and validation was explored by Box plot with a whisker. Parameter sensitivity analysis results show CN2 and GW_DELAY are the high class parameters for SWAT. The manning “n” value and soil depth “d” parameters were also the most sensitive parameters in RRI model. The results from this study will helpful water resources managers and stakeholders involved in the water management of local river basins using models.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know