Volatility dependent smooth transitions and abrupt switches: why they are needed for better forecasting the FX rates
Eurasian Economic Review, ISSN: 2147-429X, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 315-332
2022
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Exchange rate prediction is a problematic area. There still does not exist a structural exchange rate model that can consistently predict future exchange rates better than a driftless random walk model. This paper draws attention to two important points regarding this problem. First of all, many structural exchange rate models inherently depend on the uncovered interest parity (UIP) rule. However, empirical evidence almost universally rejects UIP. Therefore, this paper firstly questions whether it would be possible to improve the predictions of UIP by converting it into a nonlinear form since the workhorse UIP specification has traditionally been linear. Secondly, this paper also discusses that a nonlinear transformation is indeed a necessity given that exchange rates typically follow meandering time paths. Inspired by a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) report, UIP model is estimated by volatility-dependent Threshold autoregression (TAR) and Smooth transition regression (STR) specifications using a dataset on two popular carry trade currencies against the US dollar and the Japanese yen. Estimations clearly favor TAR and STR over a linear specification. Although random walk model remains as the champion, results are still indicative of the usefulness of a volatility-dependent regime switching framework for improving the prediction performances of various other structural models that are dependent on UIP.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know