Breeding onion for resistance to Fusarium basal rot: comparison of field selection and artificial inoculation
Tropical Plant Pathology, ISSN: 1983-2052, Vol: 45, Issue: 5, Page: 493-498
2020
- 8Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Fusarium basal rot (FBR) is one of the main onion diseases in Argentina. The Onion Breeding National Program, held at INTA Experimental Station in La Consulta, Argentina, has developed onion breeding lines with increased resistance to FBR through a selection scheme performed under field conditions. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the achieved response to selection in the FBR resistance trait, comparing two strategies: selection under field environment and artificial inoculations performed in controlled conditions. Seeds of the breeding line 17-1289 (P) were inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cepae (isolate FOC LJC10081), one seed per cap. After 15 days 162 surviving plants were treated with fungicide and transplanted. The resulting bulbs were planted and recombined avoiding contamination with foreign pollinators. The obtained seeds were labelled as PCC (Progeny generated under Controlled Conditions). Another portion of P seeds was grown under field conditions in a FBR-conductive soil. The best bulbs were selected at harvest based on their FBR resistance score, root system quality and agronomic features. These bulbs later produced seeds by recombination in isolation and were labelled as PFC (Progeny generated under Field Conditions). The P population and the PCC-PFC progenies were then compared through a standardized test for determination of FBR resistance, using two inoculum concentrations in the substrate. The incidence of FBR was significantly reduced in PCC at high inoculum concentrations, in comparison to the original population P. Disease progression was delayed and lower rates were achieved in PCC. The described lab selection technique may constitute an interesting and useful tool to select materials that carry genetic resistance and contribute to an integrative approach, complemented with selection under field conditions, in onion breeding programs for FBR resistance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084614731&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40858-020-00351-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know