Should Adenocarcinoma of Cervix be Treated Differently to Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, ISSN: 2363-8400, Vol: 19, Issue: 1
2021
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and patterns of failure, in patients with SCC and ADC of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy and to determine whether ADC should be treated differently. Methods: Total of 494 patients treated between January 1996 and December 2012 with definitive radiotherapy were included for analysis. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were compared using long-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the role of histology after adjusting for potential confounders impacting on survival. Results: The 5-year RFS of node-negative SCC and ADC was 79% and 75% and of node-positive SCC and ADC was 51% and 37%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 74% for both node-negative SCC and ADC and 54% and 42% for node-positive SCC and ADC, respectively. This difference in RFS and OS among these four subgroups was not significant. The tumour volume (p = 0.005), corpus invasion (p = 0.022) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of RFS, whereas histology (p = 0.204) was not. Increasing age (p < 0.001), ECOG performance score 2 (p = 0.04), tumour volume (p = 0.009) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were predictive for OS, but histology (p = 0.458) was not. There was no difference in pelvic and extra-pelvic failure of the two histological subtypes. Conclusion: Both these histological types exhibit similar clinical behaviour and survival when matched for prognostic factors. Hence, current standard of care was equally effective in both histological types.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100559154&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know