Biomarkers for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV)
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, ISSN: 2363-8400, Vol: 19, Issue: 3
2021
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Review Description
The role of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in the aetiology of invasive cervical carcinoma has been well established. At least 13 genotypes have been found to be associated with the risk to develop cervical cancer. Several biomarkers have been recognized which roughly identify specific stages in the natural history of HPV infection and cervical cancer progression. They include the presence of viral proteins, viral nucleic acids or alteration of cellular features induced by viral oncoproteins. In the context of screening, good sensitivity of test has to be balanced against the test's specificity. Specificity is particularly important in cervical cancer screening because screening involves large numbers of otherwise healthy women, and positive results require a follow-up colposcopic evaluation that is both uncomfortable and costly. The two methods, i.e. testing for nucleic acids of high-risk HPVs or the cellular surrogate markers of HPV, are the primary cervical cancer screening method in many countries. Unfortunately, CIN2 and CIN3 are the endpoint of all the available studies and the target of treatment. New biomarkers such as viral and cellular methylation profiles could represent the most accurate markers for cancer progression with high sensitivity and specificity in near future.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107475195&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40944-021-00529-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know