Comparison of Pb(II) Adsorption by Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace and Phosphorus Slags; Exploitation of RSM
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction A: Science, ISSN: 2364-1819, Vol: 45, Issue: 3, Page: 899-911
2021
- 25Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One of the environmental issues is the release of heavy metal ions into groundwater, in which finding a cost-effective solution is crucial. In this study, lead as a toxic heavy metal cation was adsorbed by two low-cost industrial products of ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) and phosphorus slag (PS). Both adsorbents were characterized by various analyses. The response surface methodology (RSM) based on the central composite design (CCD) method is employed to compare the performance of both adsorbents in Pb(II) removal from an aqueous solution. The experiment design was performed by considering three factors of initial Pb(II) concentration (20–100 mg.L), rotation rate (15–195 rpm), and adsorbent weight (0.1–2.1 g) at five levels. From the RSM predictions, the maximum adsorption capacity was obtained at 0.1 g, 100 mg.L, and 195 rpm. Based on the adsorption capacity data, GGBFS was more efficient than PS adsorbent in Pb(II) removal under the same conditions. The most influential parameter on the adsorption capacity was the adsorbent weight, and the other parameters had no significant effects. The influence of rotation rate could be observed only at low adsorbent weights. Two correlations are developed by taking into account the interaction effects between the studied parameters that fitted well the experimental data with R-values of 0.986 and 0.993 for GGBFS and PS, respectively. The statistical parameters and plots were also reported for the adsorption capacity of the both adsorbents.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101028135&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-021-01075-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know