Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2364-1843, Vol: 49, Issue: 2, Page: 1715-1732
2025
- 2Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
Article Description
Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to calculate the factor of safety (F¯) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating F¯ from soft computing methods (boosted trees (BT) and gene expression programming (GEP)) and two regression methods (MLR and MNLR) data-driven based methods are used. Values of F¯ for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (LEMs). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as R, RMSE, RE%, MAE and NSE, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, RE% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the MARS model is closer to the extracted results of the MNLR model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the GEP model with R = 0.994, RMSE = 0.0381, RE% = 1.66%, MAE = 0.027 and NSE = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating F¯. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (LEM).
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know