A novel composite machine learning model for the prediction of compressive strength of blended concrete
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, ISSN: 2365-3167, Vol: 10, Issue: 1
2025
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Blended cement, comprising clinker and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, slag, and silica fume, forms blended concrete when combined with aggregates. This study introduced a novel ensemble approach, the LightGBM and ANN Fusion (LAF) model, to check the prediction of compressive strength in blended concrete using eight key input features, including cement content, slag, fly ash, water, and curing age, derived from 1030 samples. The LAF model synergistically combines predictions from LightGBM and ANN with the fusion weight (alpha) dynamically optimized using Support Vector Machine (SVM) analysis. This integration leverages the strengths of both models while mitigating their individual limitations. The LAF model exhibited superior performance, with an R² of 0.9514 during training and 0.8863 during testing, significantly surpassing standalone models such as LightGBM (R² = 0.9385) and ANN (R² = 0.9136). It achieved the lowest error rates, including an MSE of 15.7384 and RMSE of 3.9672 during training, underscoring its robust generalization capabilities. The novel utilization of SVM-tuned alpha for dynamic model adaptation reduces overfitting and enhances predictive accuracy compared to traditional ensemble and single models. Comparative analysis with existing ensemble techniques, including stacking and gradient-boosted ANN, further validated the superior accuracy and adaptability of the LAF model. This approach represents a significant advancement in predictive modeling, offering a scientifically sound and versatile framework for concrete strength prediction. Future research will refine the SVM tuning, expand the model’s application to other material properties, and explore real-time deployment, positioning the LAF model as a pioneering tool for smart construction materials.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know