An extended MARCOS approach and generalized Dombi aggregation operators-based group decision-making for emergency logistics suppliers selection utilizing q-rung picture fuzzy information
Granular Computing, ISSN: 2364-4974, Vol: 9, Issue: 1
2024
- 5Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The evaluation and selection of emergency logistics suppliers (ELSs) is of great significance for improving the disaster relief material reserve system and enhancing the efficient operation of the emergency material guarantee system. Considering the inherent suddenness and uncertainty characteristics of emergency events, this paper establishes a hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) decision framework under q-rung picture fuzzy (q-RPF) environment to scientifically and reasonably determine the optimal ELS. To begin with, some novel q-RPF operational laws are built based on the generalized Dombi operations, and a series of novel q-RPF aggregation operators are propounded to integrate q-RPF information, as well as some special instances and valuable properties are probed at length. Then a correlation coefficient-based algorithm and q-RPF logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting (LOPCOW) method are put forward to identify the weight of expert and assessment criteria, severally. Further, the q-RPF measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method is presented on the basis of the developed operators to ascertain the prioritization of ELSs. Lastly, an empirical that selects the optimal ELS is implemented to validate the practicability and availability of the created q-RPF-LOPCOW–MARCOS framework. The robustness and superiority of the decision framework for ELS selection are verified through sensitivity and comparative analysis. This research proposes a new methodology for evaluating ELSs and can assist emergency managers in quickly and accurately selecting suitable suppliers after emergencies.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know