First-principles study on the mechanical properties of MCT (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; T = O, F, OH) MXenes
Nuclear Science and Techniques, ISSN: 2210-3147, Vol: 30, Issue: 11
2019
- 17Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal carbides known as MXenes belong to a new branch of 2D material family, and their fundamental properties vary with their compositions and surface functionalizations. In this study, the structural and ideal mechanical properties of MC-type MXenes and their functionalized MCT MXenes (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; T = O, F, OH) were systematically examined via first-principles methods. The stress–strain curves of the MXenes under homogenous biaxial and uniaxial tension are identified, and the fundamental quantities (e.g., Young’s modulus, in-plane stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio) are addressed. With significantly higher strength and extended critical strains, the MCO MXenes exhibit optimal flexibility when compared with that of MC, MCF, and MC(OH). Additionally, HfCT exhibits optimal tensile performance under uniaxial or biaxial tension when compared to that of TiCT and ZrCT. The Young’s modulus, in-plane stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio of MXenes with different surface functionalization increase in a sequence corresponding to OH < F < O. Furthermore, the effects of vacancy on the mechanical properties of MXenes are further explored and indicate that vacancy can significantly weaken the tensile properties of MXenes that are considered. Moreover, vacancy also results in a certain anisotropy of stress along armchair and zigzag directions even under the biaxial tension condition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074249052&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x/fulltext.html; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=6608005&internal_id=6608005&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41365-019-0688-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know