Two-proton radioactivity from excited states of proton-rich nuclei within Coulomb and Proximity Potential Model
Nuclear Science and Techniques, ISSN: 2210-3147, Vol: 34, Issue: 9
2023
- 3Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
Article Description
In the present work, we extend the Coulomb and Proximity Potential Model (CPPM) to study two-proton (2p) radioactivity from excited states while the proximity potential is chosen as AW95 proposed by Aage Withner in 1995. Demonstration reveals that the theoretical results acquired by CPPM exhibit a high level of consistency with prior theoretical models such as the unified fission model (UFM), generalized liquid-drop model (GLDM) and effective liquid-drop model (ELDM). Furthermore, within the CPPM, we predicted the half-lives of potential 2p radioactive nuclei for which experimental data are currently unavailable. The predicted results were then assessed, compared with UFM, ELDM and GLDM models, and examined in detail.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170221999&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01268-2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41365-023-01268-2; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7576944&internal_id=7576944&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01268-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41365-023-01268-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know