Prediction of UCS of fine-grained soil based on machine learning part 2: comparison between hybrid relevance vector machine and Gaussian process regression
Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, ISSN: 2520-8179, Vol: 7, Issue: 1, Page: 123-163
2024
- 30Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The present research employs the models based on the relevance vector machine (RVM) approach to predict the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the cohesive virgin (fine-grained) soil. For this purpose, the Linear, Polynomial, Gaussian, and Laplacian kernel functions have been implemented in RVM models. Two types of RVM models have been developed: (i) single kernel function based (mentioned by SRVM) and (ii) dual kernel function-based (mentioned by DRVM). Each model has been optimized by each genetic (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Eighty-five data points (75 training + ten testing) have been collected from the literature to train and test the SRVM and DRVM models. The data proportionality method has been used to create six training databases, i.e., 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%, to determine the effect of the quality and quantity of training database on the performance, accuracy, and overfitting of the soft computing models. Ten conventional and three new performance parameters, i.e., a20 index, index of agreement (IOA), and index of scatter (IOS), have measured the performance of models. The present research concludes that (i) a strongly correlated pair of data points affect the performance and accuracy of the model; (ii) GA-optimized SRVM model MD119 has outperformed other SRVM and DRVM models with a20 = 100, IOA = 0.9947, and IOS = 0.0272; (iii) k-fold cross-validation test (k = 10) validates the capabilities of SRVM and DRVM models; (iv) model MD119 has predicted UCS better than GPR model MD11 developed in part 1 of this research; (v) high correlated data points increases the overfitting of the model; (vi) model MD119 has predicted UCS of lab tested soil with a confidence interval of ± 4.0%.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know