Resizing columns in typical eccentric and torsionally irregular multi-storied buildings
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2522-011X, Vol: 23, Issue: 6, Page: 943-959
2022
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Structures with asymmetric plans, disproportionate strength, and unequal mass distribution exhibit undesirable behavior during severe ground motion and initiate a collapse mechanism. The eccentricity in a building is a major factor that influences this behavior. To reduce eccentricity popular practices, such as steel braces, shear walls, seismic isolation, and haunches might not be viable in different scenarios due to technical, financial, functional or architectural requirements. This paper discusses a more convenient and economical method of resizing the columns to mitigate the eccentricity and torsion. The viability of this method is assessed by iterating with different sizes of columns in two building models and evaluating the corresponding eccentricity changes. The sum of findings highlights that resizing the columns is very effective for buildings with initially smaller-sized columns (generally low-to-mid-rise buildings). However, the effectiveness of this method decreases as the column size increases. To compare the efficacy of column resizing technique, analysis of structures with diagonal steel bracing system has been carried out. The analysis showed that the bracing system improved the performance of buildings in terms of eccentricity and torsional irregularity; however, the cost of adding a bracing system would be much higher than the resizing technique.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know