Integrating the multi-objective particle swarm optimization-based time–cost trade-off model with earned value management
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2522-011X, Vol: 24, Issue: 8, Page: 3293-3303
2023
- 4Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Many interrelated activities exist in real construction projects, and each activity can be carried out in a variety of ways with varying resource requirements, times to completion, and costs. A significant amount of focus has been placed on construction project scheduling while resolving time–cost trade-off problems (TCTPs) prior to carrying out the actual construction. However, according to the earned value management (EVM) principle, if a project deviates from the real time and cost budgeted, it should be rescheduled throughout the execution phase. The article first identifies the optimal combination of activities based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) for this purpose, and then uses the EVM theory to predict the project's overall performance at a specific point in execution. If anticipated project performance points to rescheduling, the revised alternatives must be allocated to project activities. Construction managers may more easily arrange, manage, and reschedule actual construction projects with the use of the created TCT-EVM model before and during the execution phase. To show how useful and effective the established model is, it is also used in a case study project. Moreover, after contrasting the outcomes with those attained using pre-existing TCT models, the superiority of the created model is shown.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know