Measurement and prediction of cavitating flow-induced vibrations
Journal of Hydrodynamics, ISSN: 1878-0342, Vol: 30, Issue: 6, Page: 1064-1071
2018
- 36Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef21
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
The objective of this paper is to investigate the unsteady cavitation behaviors and the corresponding cavitating flow-induced vibrations. Results are presented for the modified NACA66 hydrofoils made of stainless steel and POM Polyacetate respectively at Re = 6.0×10 for various cavitation regimes. The high-speed camera and the single point laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) are used to observe the transient cavitating flow patterns and measure the vibration velocities. The results showed that the vibration amplitude increases dramatically for the cloud cavitation due to the development of large-scale cloud cavity. The main flow-induced frequencies, which are in accordance with the cavity shedding frequency, decrease with the decrease of the cavitation number. As for the effect of the hydroelastic response on the vibration behavior, the lift coefficient for the POM Polyacetate hydrofoil fluctuates more significantly with a larger mean value than that for the stainless steel hydrofoil. Compared with the vaporous cavity along the suction side of the stainless steel hydrofoil, the cavity for POM Polyacetate hydrofoil appears to be fragmentized. The main vibration frequencies for the POM Polyacetate hydrofoil are larger than that for the stainless steel hydrofoil, with the chaotic hydroelastic response with high frequency.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057611316&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0115-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42241-018-0115-5; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=6391439&internal_id=6391439&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0115-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42241-018-0115-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know