Bone regeneration with hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials
Emergent Materials, ISSN: 2522-574X, Vol: 3, Issue: 4, Page: 521-544
2020
- 131Citations
- 254Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Surface-Modified Nano-Hydroxyapatite Uniformly Dispersed on High-Porous GelMA Scaffold Surfaces for Enhanced Osteochondral Regeneration
Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent age-related degenerative disease causing joint pain and cartilage breakdown, leading to a substantial economic impact.1 Current clinical treatment follows
Review Description
Degeneration, trauma, and tumor resection are the main causes of bone loss (Owen et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 106(6), 2493-2512 (2018), Korkusuz et al., (2014), Kondo et al., Biomaterials. 26, 5600-5608 (2005), Matsumine et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 86-B, 5 (2004), Christensen et al., Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 24, 2380-2387 (2016), Calabrese et al. Scientific Reports. 7(1), 1-11 (2017); Korkusuz et al. (2017), Morimoto et al. Spine J. 15, 1379-1390 (2015); Tang et al. Biomaterials 83, 363-382 (2016)). Autografts are still considered as the golden standard for bone regeneration. Donor site shortage, prolonged surgery time, blood loss, and donor site morbidity are the main drawbacks. Allografts are osteoconductive and to an extent osteoinductive. But they have low osteogenicity, possible immunologic reactions, and low mechanical strength and are associated with ethical or religious concerns. In order to overcome these disadvantages, studies on composites with ideal ranges of porosity, biodegradation rate, bioactivity, osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, and mechanical properties are a popular research area.Calcium phosphate ceramics (CPCs) are biodegradable, biocompatible, and bioactive materials. Their resemblance to the inorganic part of bone makes them good alternatives to autografts and allografts (Korkusuz et al. (2014), Jeong et al. Biomaterials Research 23, 4 (2019), Rouahi et al., Colloids Surf. B: Biointerf. 47(1), 10-19 (2006)). Throughout CPCs, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), biphasic calcium phosphates (BCPs), and hydroxyapatite (HA) are frequently used in regeneration studies. Hydroxyapatite [Ca(PO)(OH)] is the main inorganic component of bones (~ 70% of bone tissue). HA is combined with many different natural or synthetic polymers and/or growth factors/cells to imitate the natural structure of bone in order to achieve bone formation and regeneration by either enhancing its osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, or both. Nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) has a smaller grain size, and therefore, the increased surface area allows more cells and proteins to adhere on the surface. This therefore increases the ideal properties of a bone substitute. Here in this review, the use of HA in bone regeneration is briefly summarized.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know