Role of vulvovaginal candidiasis infection in infertility: systematic review and meta-analysis
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, ISSN: 1678-4405, Vol: 55, Issue: 1, Page: 65-74
2024
- 2Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Review Description
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between fungal infection in the female genital tract and infertility. Data sources: A systematic review was carried out, and the search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022. The search strategy used standardized keywords such as “candidiasis” and “infertility,” combined with their respective synonyms. The search was limited to human studies, with no language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria: Primary articles that evaluated women of reproductive age with and without infertility and related to the presence or absence of candidiasis were included. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: For the analyses, the odds ratio association measure was used with a confidence interval of 95% using RevMan software (version 5.4). Results: Eight studies, published between 1995 and 2021 in different countries around the world, were included in this systematic review. Two studies were excluded after sensitivity analysis. A total of 909 participants were included in the group of infertile women and 2363 women in the control group. The age of the evaluated women varied between 18 and 50 years. The random effect model was used and showed no significant difference when comparing candidiasis between fertile and infertile women (odds ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval 0.86, 2.41 p= 0.17). Conclusions: There was no association between candidiasis and female sterility.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180884285&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-01225-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38153623; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42770-023-01225-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-01225-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42770-023-01225-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know