Discovering Evolving Temporal Information: Theory and Application to Clinical Databases
SN Computer Science, ISSN: 2661-8907, Vol: 1, Issue: 3
2020
- 6Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Functional dependencies (FDs) allow us to represent database constraints, corresponding to requirements as “patients having the same symptoms undergo the same medical tests.” Some research efforts have focused on extending such dependencies to consider also temporal constraints such as “patients having the same symptoms undergo in the next period the same medical tests.” Temporal functional dependencies are able to represent such kind of temporal constraints in relational databases. Another extension for FDs allows one to represent approximate functional dependencies (AFDs), as “patients with the same symptomsgenerallyundergo the same medical tests.” It enables data to deviate from the defined constraints according to a user-defined percentage. Approximate temporal functional dependencies (ATFDs) merge the concepts of temporal functional dependency and of approximate functional dependency. Among the different kinds of ATFD, the Approximate Pure Temporally Evolving Functional Dependencies (APE-FDs for short) allow one to detect patterns on the evolution of data in the database and to discover dependencies as “For most patients with the same initial diagnosis, the same medical test is prescribed after the occurrence of same symptom.” Mining ATFDs from large databases may be computationally expensive. In this paper, we focus on APE-FDs and prove that, unfortunately, verifying a single APE-FD over a given database instance is in general NP-complete. In order to cope with this problem, we propose a framework for mining complex APE-FDs in real-world data collections. In the framework, we designed and applied sound and advanced model-checking techniques. To prove the feasibility of our proposal, we used real-world databases from two medical domains (namely, psychiatry and pharmacovigilance) and tested the running prototype we developed on such databases.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127486201&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42979-020-00160-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know