UPLC-ESI-QToF-MS Metabolomics Comparison Between Wild and Cultivated Porophyllum ruderale, a Non-conventional Edible Plant
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, ISSN: 1981-528X, Vol: 34, Issue: 4, Page: 750-757
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Porophyllum ruderale Jacq. Cass., Asteraceae, is a non-conventional edible plant widespread in the South of Brazil where it is used for wound healing and to treat inflammation. This plant grows in different soil conditions, causing discrepancies in its chemical profile that can consequently induce different outcomes as a phytomedicine. Thus, the present paper aims to study and compare the chemical profile of wild and cultivated P. ruderale from Santa Catarina and Paraná states, Brazil. UPLC-ESI-QToF-MS data allowed the identification of 36 substances including phenolic acids, diterpene aminoglycoside derivatives (reported for the first time for this species), fatty acids, and chlorophyll derivatives. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis results were used to distinguish different metabolites among P. ruderale samples into eight well-defined groups. Aminoglycoside wedelosides (putatively identification) present a high contribution to the dataset variability of P. ruderale samples. Overall, the metabolic profile of P. ruderale provides new information for this non-conventional edible plant used both as food and a traditional remedy. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know