Evaluation of agronomic waste disinfection methods for oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus Jacq. P. Kumm) cultivation
Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, ISSN: 2454-9983
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Agronomic waste disinfection is crucial to the production parameters and economic viability of edible mushroom cultivation. Method selection should be based on efficiency, cost, and accessibility. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of different disinfection methods on the Pleurotus ostreatus cultivation. For the mushroom cultivation, the wet mass equivalent to 1 kg of dry mass of agronomic waste was used and bagged in polypropylene bags. The agronomic wastes were inoculated at 5% with the PO/A01 strain, followed by the incubation, induction, and fruiting with three harvest flows. A completely randomized experimental design was used, with five disinfection methods, immersion in tap water (control), alkaline water, hot water, pasteurization, and sterilization, and six repetitions. Mycelial growth (cm day), earliness (days), biological efficiency (%), production rate (%) and contamination percentage were analyzed. The results were subjected to an Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey means test and Pearson’s correlation analysis at a significance level of 5% (P < 0.05). Immersion in alkaline water, in corn stubble, showed greater control in the contamination percentage, promoted greater mycelial growth, and increased earliness, while in rice straw it was inefficient to inhibit contamination. We observed greater mycelial growth in the rice straw substrate when immersed in hot water, which indicates greater sensitivity of this agronomic waste to thermal shock. Sterilization promoted greater biological efficiency in corn stubble (95.51%) and hot water immersion resulted in higher values in rice straw (86.98%). The pasteurization method showed lower biological efficiency and production rate, resulting, on average, in 55.12% and 0.75%, respectively. We concluded that, although the efficiency of the disinfection method depends on the chemical characteristics intrinsic to the agronomic waste used, immersion in hot water and immersion in alkaline water would be the most efficient and accessible methods for rural producers. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know