Investigating FIT kit completion for CRC screening in younger adults in rural areas
Discover Social Science and Health, ISSN: 2731-0469, Vol: 4, Issue: 1
2024
- 1Citations
- 22Usage
- 3Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage22
- Downloads22
- Captures3
- Readers3
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Findings from University of Nebraska Medical Center Broaden Understanding of Social Science and Health (Investigating FIT kit completion for CRC screening in younger adults in rural areas)
2024 OCT 08 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Clinical Trials Daily -- New study results on social science and health have
Article Description
Rural regions have higher incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) than urban regions, while screening is lower in rural residents than in urban residents. Rural residents experience barriers to CRC screening due to a lack of access to healthcare, perceived lack of privacy, and other cultural factors. The fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) may provide an inexpensive and convenient alternative for those lacking access to a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. In a clinical trial, we investigated factors that influenced the return of a FIT kit for CRC screening among 1,230 rural residents in a midwestern U.S. state. Participants were selected from two cancer screening databases maintained by the state health department. Participants returning and not returning the FIT kit were compared for differences by age category (45–54, 55–64, 65–74), gender (female vs. male), race (non-white vs. white), and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. not Hispanic) using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to assess differences in FIT kit return time by age and gender. The youngest age group was significantly less likely to return the FIT kit and were slower at returning it when they did. In models adjusted for age category, females were significantly more likely to return the FIT kit than males and returned the FIT kit sooner than males. The results suggest that efforts are needed to reach those 45 to 55, especially males, who are not likely to see the need for CRC screening.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204286535&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44155-024-00102-3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44155-024-00102-3; https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/coph_epidem_articles/206; https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=coph_epidem_articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44155-024-00102-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44155-024-00102-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know