Applications of tandem microbore liquid chromatography and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/electroblotting in microsequence analysis
Analytical Biochemistry, ISSN: 0003-2697, Vol: 168, Issue: 1, Page: 5-15
1988
- 21Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- CrossRef21
- 20
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Protein isolation by microbore HPLC is compared with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)/electroblotting methods for several major proteins from rabbit muscle. Although single-mode HPLC or SDS-PAGE/electroblotting provides excellent speed and sensitivity for submicrogram-level protein purification, neither one alone has adequate resolution for separating such a complex protein mixture. Tandem procedures, utilizing two different modes of HPLC in separate steps or a combination of single HPLC separation and SDS-PAGE/electroblotting, offer the necessary versatility. One of the major concerns in this investigation was to evaluate electroblotting techniques for microsequencing. The Aebersold et al. procedure ( R. H. Aebersold, D. B. Teplow, L. E. Hood, and S. B. H. Kent (1986) J. Biol. Chem.261, 4229–4238 ) was substantially modified and improved; the details of this work will be published elsewhere. These changes significantly improve repetitive yields at the low microgram level without producing high backgrounds. At lower levels the recovery of sequenceable protein currently limits our ability to obtain useful results. Starting with 250–750 μg of rabbit muscle crude extract, several proteins (15–70 kDa) were isolated by tandem microbore LC and PAGE/electroblotting for amino-terminal sequence analysis. It appears that the combination of electroblotting and microbore LC represents a powerful approach for microsample preparation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003269788900036; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90003-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023804834&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3364717; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0003269788900036; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697%2888%2990003-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697%2888%2990003-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know