Comparison of proteases from chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant strains of plasmodium falciparum
Biochemical Pharmacology, ISSN: 0006-2952, Vol: 36, Issue: 19, Page: 3285-3291
1987
- 51Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations51
- Citation Indexes51
- 51
- CrossRef45
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
An aminopeptidase and four hemoglobin-degrading acid proteases have been isolated from cloned strains of chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Aminopeptidases from both strains showed similar properties including molecular weights of 63,000 and noncompetitive inhibition by chloroquine; K i = 535 and 410 μ M for enzymes from the sensitive and resistant strains respectively. The acid proteases from the chloroquine-sensitive strain included a low molecular weight enzyme in the soluble fraction (protease S), an enzyme weakly associated with membrane (protease M 2 ), and two enzymes strongly associated with membrane (proteases M 3 and M 4 ). The acid proteases from the chloroquine-resistant strain included protease S, protease M 2, a second enzyme weakly associated with membrane (protease M 1 ), and protease M 3. All of the acid proteases were inhibited by ferriprotoporphyrin IX and by the chloroquine-ferriprotoporphyrin IX complex, I 50 = 5–25 μ M. The data were consistent with a model for chloroquine action wherein chloroquine acts to divert ferriprotoporphyrin IX from sequestration into malarial pigment, leaving ferriprotoporphyrin IX (or its chloroquine complex) to interfere with digestion of host cytosol by inhibiting hemoglobin-degrading proteases. However, the similarities among the proteases from chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant strains of parasites suggest that chloroquine resistance does not result from changes in parasite proteases.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006295287906460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(87)90646-0; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023201135&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3311049; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0006295287906460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952%2887%2990646-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952%2887%2990646-0
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know