Biochemical studies of trophic dependencies in crayfish giant axons
Brain Research, ISSN: 0006-8993, Vol: 143, Issue: 2, Page: 213-232
1978
- 38Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations38
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef23
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Data from previous histological studies 28 indicate that long-term survival of crayfish medial giant axons might be due in part to trophic support from cells of the surrounding glial sheath which often hypertrophy in response to transection of the medial giants. The biochemical studies reported herein show that segments from transected ventral nerve cords (VNC) always incorporate more [ 3 H]leucine into protein than do corresponding segments from intact VNCs. Furthermore, the relative amount of [ 3 H]leucine incorporation in severed segments seems to be influenced by distance and direction from the lesion site as well as time after lesioning. Similar spatiotemporal parameters were previously shown to be correlated with extent of glial hypertrophy around severed medial giant axons 28. Quantitative autoradiography of medial giant axons after incubation in [ 3 H]-leucine revealed that the grain density of label in glial sheaths surrounding severed medial giants was over two-fold greater than in sheaths around corresponding control axons. Moreover, the grain density in the axoplasm of severed medial giants was nearly four-fold greater than the grain density in the axoplasm of control axons. Data from experiments using short or long labeling intervals suggests that labeling in the medial giant axoplasm may be due more to transfer from glial sheat cells than from inherent axonal synthetic mechanisms. In light of this and other data, we conclude that long-term survival of severed medial giant axons is probably due to the direct transfer of trophic substances from cells of the glial sheath into the axon.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006899378905656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(78)90565-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0017813736&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/75753; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0006899378905656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993%2878%2990565-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993%2878%2990565-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know