A numerical study of plasticity models and finite element types
Computers & Structures, ISSN: 0045-7949, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 669-675
1983
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The available experimental results for the cyclic loading of a simply supported circular plate using a rigid circular punch is utilized to compare the numerical results obtained from computations performed using the four most popular work hardening plasticity models, namely, the isotropic, kinematic, mechanical sublayer and the Mroz models. The mechanical sublayer model appears to be the most efficient in this group. Using the mechanical sublayer model the computational efficiencies of the 3, 4 and 8-node finite elements are studied. The 8-node element emerges as the most suitable element type for the present problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0045794983901165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(83)90116-5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0020264796&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0045794983901165; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0045794983901165?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0045794983901165?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949%2883%2990116-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949%2883%2990116-5
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know