The pH dependence of the hydrolysis of chromogenic substrates of the type, Lys-Pro-Xaa-Yaa-Phe-(NO 2 )Phe-Arg-Leu, by selected aspartic proteinases: evidence for specific interactions in subsites S 3 and S 2
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, ISSN: 0167-4838, Vol: 913, Issue: 2, Page: 122-130
1987
- 70Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations70
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef52
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Variation in the kinetic parameters, k cat and K m, with pH has been used to obtain evidence for significant acid-dissociation processes in the hydrolysis of octapeptide substrates by three aspartic proteinases. These substrates are all cleaved at the peptide bond between a Phe (P1) and a p -nitroPhe (P1′) residue resulting in a shift in absorbance at 300 nm that facilitates kinetic measurements. The substrates differ in the amino-acid residues present in the P3 and P2 positions. Porcine pepsin, calf chymosin, and the aspartic proteinase from Endothia parasitica all show pH dependencies that imply that favorable or unfavorable interactions can occur with the S3 or S2 areas of the enzyme-active site. Examination of the crystallographically determined structure of the E. parasitica proteinase and consideration of the amino-acid sequence differences between the three enzymes suggests that the origin of the pH effects arises from favorable interactions between Glu-13 (COO − ) of pig pepsin and Thr (OH) or His (ImH + ) in P3 of a substrate. Similarly, Lys-220 (NH + 3 ) of chymosin and a Glu (COO − ) in P2 of a substrate may produce a favorable interaction and Asp-77 (COO − ) of E. parasitica proteinase and a Glu (COO − ) in P2 of a substrate may produce an unfavorable interaction. These results lead to possible explanations for subtle specificity differences within a family of homologous enzymes, and suggest loci for study by site-directed mutagenesis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167483887903207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(87)90320-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023190117&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3109484; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0167483887903207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838%2887%2990320-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838%2887%2990320-7
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know