Mutagenicity of PM2.5 ☆
Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, Page: 497-504
2019
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Book Chapter Description
PM2.5 pollution is one of the most important concerns involved in the evaluation of the health effects of air pollution. The mutagenic activity of ambient outdoor air has been widely reviewed in the literature; however, only during the last 15 years there are data specifically regarding PM2.5. The mutagenic properties of fine PM are generally higher than those of coarse PM. Moreover, the ultrafine particles (UFPs) contribution to the total PM mutagenicity is the highest. PM2.5 organic extracts are generally mutagenic, especially in winter, in urban environments, or in proximity to the chief emission sources of air pollutants. Combustion reactions and the atmospheric reactions of gaseous pollutants with hydrocarbons result in a large number of dispersed DNA-reactive compounds. Biological assays could indicate both genotoxicity and mutagenicity tests. The last are assays able to simulate the effects of the complex environmental mixture on a biological system and might indicate the ability of known or unknown compounds in a mixture to interact with DNA-producing mutation processes. This approach is useful in a screening evaluation of the genotoxic and cancer risk associated with air pollution. The accumulated data supported the evaluations of the global genotoxic burden for urban populations and could promote precautionary measures taken to reduce environmental pollution. Today the PM2.5 limits seem to be not enough cautionary for the public health. Future studies need to be carried out on specific PM2.5 sources and specific chemical compounds endorsed to the particles and on the UFPs that are responsible for most of the mutagenic effects. The application of different biological assays may support and complete Salmonella assay results as well as supply biological evidence that helps to elucidate carcinogenic pathways.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124095489109388; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10938-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079534323&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780124095489109388; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780124095489109388?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780124095489109388?httpAccept=text/plain; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780124095489109388; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780124095489109388?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780124095489109388?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10938-8
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know