Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities
Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Page: 497-545
2015
- 74Citations
- 185Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
This chapter focuses on sustainability assessments in the built environment through multicriterion rating systems. Recent interpretations of the concepts of sustainability, assessment, and sustainability assessment in the built environment are discussed before reviewing existing assessment systems. In particular, this chapter focuses on sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities. A comparison between assessment systems at these different scales of the built environment is performed before focusing on the need of cross-scale evaluations. In particular, rating systems that have tools for the different scales such as BREEAM, LEED, and CASBEE are presented and compared. Each one of these systems bases the assessment on the summation of rates for different criteria, often selected in a no transparent way. The comparison shows that previous systems often accept weak sustainability when natural resources may be substituted by other priorities. Moreover, missing assessment criteria are indicated mainly within the social and economic dimensions of sustainability. This chapter also shows that the dynamicity of the built environment suggests considering the sustainability assessment systems as tools to monitor the evolution of the built environment as well as citizens’ lives. Finally, the chapter shows the importance of adapting sustainability goals and indicators of each specific situation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780127999685000154; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-799968-5.00015-4; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944392252&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780127999685000154; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780127999685000154?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780127999685000154?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780127999685000154; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780127999685000154?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780127999685000154?httpAccept=text/plain; https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fb978-0-12-799968-5.00015-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-799968-5.00015-4
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know