Biomass anaerobic digestion and gasification in non-OECD countries—an overview
Substitute Natural Gas from Waste, Page: 343-387
2019
- 4Citations
- 59Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Biomass anaerobic digestion (AD) and gasification are highly relevant and noncompeting options to enhance access to clean and renewable energy in non-Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, while positively contributing to the fulfilment of numerous sustainable development goals. In spite of this high relevance, the gap between the large potential of these bioenergy production systems and their actual penetration in non-OECD countries is currently substantial, because their success is prevented by several challenges. This chapter reviews these challenges, both for distributed/household systems and more centralized ones, by focusing on three main aspects (i.e., feedstock, technology, and local context) characterizing the analyzed bioenergy value chains and proposes ways to overcome them. Particular emphasis is given to the need for adopting integrated implementation strategies that combine bottom-up and top-down approaches, on the way to achieve an equilibrium among feedstock, energy and by-products supply and demand, plant size, and end-users acceptance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128155547000131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815554-7.00013-1; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082621349&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128155547000131; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815554-7.00013-1
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know