PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Cratering rates in the outer Solar System

Icarus, ISSN: 0019-1035, Vol: 163, Issue: 2, Page: 263-289
2003
  • 472
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 133
    Captures
  • 11
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    472
    • Citation Indexes
      470
    • Policy Citations
      2
      • Policy Citation
        2
  • Captures
    133
  • Mentions
    11
    • References
      8
      • Wikipedia
        8
    • Blog Mentions
      3
      • Blog
        3

Most Recent Blog

30 km Wide Asteroid Impacted Australia 3.4 Billion Years Ago

New evidence found in northwestern Australia suggests that a massive asteroid, 20 to 30 kilometres in diameter, struck Earth about 3.5 billion years ago. This impact would have dwarfed anything experienced by humans, and dinosaurs, releasing as much energy as millions of nuclear weapons. Impacts this large can trigger earthquakes and tsunamis, and change the geological history of Earth. New eviden

Article Description

This paper is a compilation by table, graph, and equation of impact cratering rates from Jupiter to Pluto. We use several independent constraints on the number of ecliptic comets. Together they imply that the impact rate on Jupiter by 1.5-km-diameter comets is currently Ṅ ( d > 1.5 km) = 0.005−0.003+0.006 per annum. Other kinds of impactors are currently unimportant on most worlds at most sizes. The size–number distribution of impactors smaller than 20 km is inferred from size–number distributions of impact craters on Europa, Ganymede, and Triton; while the size–number distribution of impacting bodies larger than 50 km is equated to the size–number distribution of Kuiper Belt objects. The gap is bridged by interpolation. It is notable that small craters on Jupiter’s moons indicate a pronounced paucity of small impactors, while small craters on Triton imply a collisional population rich in small bodies. However it is unclear whether the craters on Triton are of heliocentric or planetocentric origin. We therefore consider two cases for Saturn and beyond: a Case A in which the size–number distribution is like that inferred at Jupiter, and a Case B in which small objects obey a more nearly collisional distribution. Known craters on saturnian and uranian satellites are consistent with either case, although surface ages are much younger in Case B, especially at Saturn and Uranus. At Neptune and especially at Saturn our cratering rates are much higher than rates estimated by Shoemaker and colleagues, presumably because Shoemaker’s estimates mostly predate discovery of the Kuiper Belt. We also estimate collisional disruption rates of moons and compare these to estimates in the literature.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know