The effects of diets on reproductive performance of eyestalk ablated and intact mud crab Scylla serrata
Aquaculture, ISSN: 0044-8486, Vol: 181, Issue: 1, Page: 81-90
2000
- 73Citations
- 101Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The reproductive performance of female mud crabs was evaluated as affected by various diets. Dietary treatments were as follows: D 1 — natural diet (mussel meat, squid, trash fish); D 2 — combination of natural and formulated diets; D 3 — formulated diet. Pond-sourced broodstock, with initial body weight of 300–400 g, were tagged in their carapace then stocked in three units of 10 m 3 broodstock tanks at eight females per tank. Half of the females were ablated and the other half were intact. Spawnings were monitored and berried females were transferred to individual 500-l tanks for incubation of eggs. Four experimental runs were conducted. Broodstock response in terms of number of spawnings, spawnings with hatching, fecundity, egg fertilization rate, total zoea produced and broodstock survival was enhanced in females fed the mixed diet (D 2 ) compared to those fed the natural diet (D 1 ) or the formulated diet (D 3 ). Larval quality measured as larval stage index followed the same trend. Results further showed that intact females fed diets D 1 and D 2 gave higher numerical values in reproductive performance and zoea growth index than ablated females while ablated females fed diet D 3 performed better than their intact counterparts. This may be attributed to presence of essential nutrients and vitamins A, C, E in the formulated diet. Latent period from gonadal maturation to first spawning was shortened by eyestalk ablation. Use of a combined diet would ensure the production of good quality eggs and large numbers of zoea with the best chance of completing the larval stages and thus, would serve as an appropriate starting point in establishing a viable mud crab aquaculture.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848699002148; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00214-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033988545&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0044848699002148; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044848699002148?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044848699002148?httpAccept=text/plain; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0044848699002148; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044848699002148?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044848699002148?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486%2899%2900214-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486%2899%2900214-8
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know